Philosophy of science in the twentieth century : four central themes / Donald Gillies.
Material type:
Item type | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
College Lane Learning Resources Centre Main Shelves | 501 GIL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 4400926531 | ||
![]() |
College Lane Learning Resources Centre Main Shelves | 501 GIL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 4400926540 | ||
![]() |
College Lane Learning Resources Centre Main Shelves | 501 GIL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 4401472093 | ||
![]() |
College Lane Learning Resources Centre Main Shelves | 501 GIL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 4400830729 |
Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:
Bibliography: p[238]-244.
Pt. I. Inductivism and its Critics. 1. Some Historical Background: Inductivism, Russell and the Cambridge School, the Vienna Circle and Popper. 2. Popper's Critique of Inductivism. His Theory of Conjectures and Refutations (or Falsificationism). 3. Duhem's Critique of Inductivism -- Pt. II. Conventionalism and the Duhem-Quine Thesis. 4. Poincare's Conventionalism of 1902. 5. The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis -- Pt. III. The Nature of Observation. 6. Protocol Sentences. 7. Is Observation Theory-Laden? -- Pt. IV. The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics. 8. Is Metaphysics Meaningless? Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle, and Popper's Critique. 9. Metaphysics in Relation to Science: The Views of Popper, Duhem, and Quine. 10. Falsificationism in the Light of the Duhem-Quine Thesis.