Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

The truth about postmodernism / Christopher Norris.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Oxford : Blackwell, 1993.ISBN:
  • 0631187170
  • 0631187189
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 190 20
LOC classification:
  • B831.2
Contents:
The 'End of Ideology' Again: Old Themes for New Times -- 'What Is Enlightenment': Foucault on Kant -- For Truth in Criticism: William Empson and the Claims of Theory -- Kant Disfigured: Ethics, Deconstruction and the Textual Sublime -- Getting at Truth: Genealogy, Critique and Postmodern Scepticism.
Summary: This book was written with a view to sorting out some of the muddles and misreadings - especially misreadings of Kant - that have characterized recent post-modernist and post-structuralist thought. For these issues have a relevance, as Norris argues, far beyond the academic enclaves of philosophy, literary theory, and cultural criticism. Thus he makes large claims for the importance of getting Kant right on the relation between epistemology, ethics and aesthetics; for pursuing the Kantian question 'What Is Enlightenment?' as raised in Foucault's late essays; or again, for recalling William Empson's spirited attempt to reassert the values of reason and truth against the orthodox 'lit crit' wisdom of his time. These are specialized concerns. But for better or worse it has been largely in the context of 'theory' - that capacious though ill-defined genre - that such issues have received their most intensive scrutiny over the past two decades. As its title suggests, The Truth About Postmodernism disputes a good deal of what currently passes for advanced theoretical wisdom. Above all it mounts a challenge to those fashionable doctrines - variants of the 'end-of-ideology' theme - that assimilate truth to some existing range of language-games, discourses, or in-place consensus beliefs. Norris's book will be welcomed for its clarity of style, its depth of philosophical engagement, and its refusal to endorse the more facile varieties of present-day textualist thought. It will also serve as a timely reminder that the 'politics of theory' cannot be practised in safe isolation from the politics (and ethics) of activist social concern.
Holdings
Item type Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Two Week Loan Two Week Loan de Havilland Learning Resources Centre Main Shelves 190 NOR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 4400926694
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

Includes index.

The 'End of Ideology' Again: Old Themes for New Times -- 'What Is Enlightenment': Foucault on Kant -- For Truth in Criticism: William Empson and the Claims of Theory -- Kant Disfigured: Ethics, Deconstruction and the Textual Sublime -- Getting at Truth: Genealogy, Critique and Postmodern Scepticism.

This book was written with a view to sorting out some of the muddles and misreadings - especially misreadings of Kant - that have characterized recent post-modernist and post-structuralist thought. For these issues have a relevance, as Norris argues, far beyond the academic enclaves of philosophy, literary theory, and cultural criticism. Thus he makes large claims for the importance of getting Kant right on the relation between epistemology, ethics and aesthetics; for pursuing the Kantian question 'What Is Enlightenment?' as raised in Foucault's late essays; or again, for recalling William Empson's spirited attempt to reassert the values of reason and truth against the orthodox 'lit crit' wisdom of his time. These are specialized concerns. But for better or worse it has been largely in the context of 'theory' - that capacious though ill-defined genre - that such issues have received their most intensive scrutiny over the past two decades. As its title suggests, The Truth About Postmodernism disputes a good deal of what currently passes for advanced theoretical wisdom. Above all it mounts a challenge to those fashionable doctrines - variants of the 'end-of-ideology' theme - that assimilate truth to some existing range of language-games, discourses, or in-place consensus beliefs. Norris's book will be welcomed for its clarity of style, its depth of philosophical engagement, and its refusal to endorse the more facile varieties of present-day textualist thought. It will also serve as a timely reminder that the 'politics of theory' cannot be practised in safe isolation from the politics (and ethics) of activist social concern.